“Data exchange” service offers individual users metadata transfer in several different formats. Citation formats are offered for transfers in texts as for the transfer into internet pages. Citation formats include permanent links that guarantee access to cited sources. For use are commonly structured metadata schemes : Dublin Core xml and ETUB-MS xml, local adaptation of international ETD-MS scheme intended for use in academic documents.
Export
Rovčanin Dragović, Isidora
A new method for stratification of the risk of Alzheimer's disease in patients in Montenegro
Autorstvo-Nekomercijalno 3.0 Srbija (CC BY-NC 3.0)
Academic metadata
Phd. theses
Medicinske nauke
doktor medicinskih nauka
Univerzitet Crne Gore
Medicinski fakultet
Studijski program Medicina
Other Theses Metadata
Nova metoda za stratifikovanje rizika za obolijevanje od Alchajmerove bolesti kod pacijenata u Crnoj Gori
PDF/A (pages)
Pathological and clinical features of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are in temporal discrepancy and currently accepted clinical tests provide the diagnosis decades after the initial pathophysiological events. In order to reach the goal of early detection of this incurable disease, research efforts are directed to the identification of non-invasive, widely accessible biomarkers, which could open the screening possibilities and overcome the main disadvantages of the current AD biomarkers. The present study offers an innovative and broader research context in this regard based on the fact that two different diseases, AD and cancer, have been shown to have inverse incidences. Namely, this recent finding has brought a different and challenging context to the knowledge about shared biological mechanisms involved in these diseases, which are mainly opposite in their nature: AD is characterized by apoptotic cell death and cancer by uncontrolled proliferation. It has been postulated that these mechanisms might actually represent different sides of the same path: if dysregulation of the common AD-CAC signaling pathways leads to a higher risk of cancer, the risk of AD will be reduced in the same individual, or vice versa. However, the precise explanations underlying this negative epidemiological association between these two diseases remain unknown. Small, non-coding RNA molecules - microRNAs (miRNAs), which simultaneously regulate the expression of multiple target genes, are deeply implicated in both diseases and proposed as having the biological complexity to explain such a challenging relationship between AD and cancer. Being well documented as the leading regulators of cell proliferation and differentiation, migration and apoptosis, which are the main pathological features of cancer and AD, miRNAs may be the key points of the pathophysiological process of both diseases. Additionally, a series of studies have demonstrated their implication in a variety of human brain dysfunctions such as innate immunity, neuroinflammation, dysregulated amyloid metabolism and oxidative stress. In fact, these processes represent the backbone of the different AD theories. Studying the miRNA roles in this disease has thus been recognized as a promising research direction and number of the miRNA interactions with the key genes involved in the pathogenesis of AD has already been identified. The most dominant theories of AD and CAC are based on two closely interconnected processes - innate immunity and inflammation, and thus, they have been chosen as the pathophysiological focus of the present study. Neuroinflammatory signaling pathways and inflammation-related microRNAs (miRNAs) could possibly have a crucial role in AD making them promising potential biomarkers. All the miRNAs selected for this study, not only have a documented role in AD and CAC, but rather, each of them has at least one target involved in immune-related and/or inflammatory pathways: miR-29a, miR-101, miR-125b, miR-146a and miR-155. In addition, the possibility to use these molecules as non-invasive biomarkers contributes to the particular translational value of the whole research context presented.
Objective: Expression of circulatory miRNAs which are deeply involved in the pathogenesis of AD and CAC: miR-29a/b, miR-101, miR-125b, miR-146a, and miR-155 were examined in healthy individuals, those whose cognitive performance on neuropsychological screening was in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) range, patients with AD and CAC. It was hypothesized that these miRNA expression levels could correlate with the level of participants’ cognitive decline leading to the identification of molecular signature of early AD. Additionally, it was expected that the expression pattern of selected miRNAs could explain the molecular basis of the inverse incidences between AD and CAC.
Methods: The present study enrolled 54 subjects, out of a total of 75 examined individuals. During the recruitment, of 34 volunteers who felt physically and mentally healthy, 18 individuals were involved in the control group (CTRL-18). Participants who did not report subjective cognitive decline (SCD) but were in the MCI range on Montreal Cognitive Assessment test, formed the low-performance MoCA group (LP-MoCA-9). AD patients were retrospectively recruited at the Neurology Clinic of the Clinical Center of Montenegro (CCM) (AD-12). They were previously diagnosed according to the criteria of the National Institute of Aging and Alzheimer’s Association. AD group included patients in the early symptomatic disease stage (EAD) - MCI due to AD and mild dementia stage, (MoCA score > 17) and advanced AD (AAD) — moderate and severe dementia (MoCA score < 17). Cognitively unimpaired CAC patients with pathohistologicaly confirmed diagnosis were recruited at the Center for Digestive Surgery — CCM (CAC-15). Standardized questionnaires, physical and neurological examinations, open-ended type of SCD evaluation, neuropsychological screening tests, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), as well as biochemical laboratory assessment, were conducted to identify exclusion criteria. Selected miRNAs were extracted from plasma, quantified by qRT-PCR and expression levels normalized by miR-361-5p gene. Statistical data analysis was done with the GraphPad Prism 9 software.
Results: As a control group, this study included volunteers without SCD, but interestingly, neuropsychological screening tests indicated that 33,3% of the apparently healthy subjects were in the MCI range. Neurological and laboratory findings could not explain their neuropsychological performance. However, in the LP-MoCA group, the two circulatory miRNAs, miR-146a and miR-155 were up-regulated compared to the CTRL group (p < 0.05). The expression level of miR-146a was also significantly higher in LP-MoCA compared to the AD group (p < 0.05). The EAD group also followed this interesting expression pattern for both, miR-146a and miR-155, the same as the heterogeneous AD group. The difference in the expression level of miR-146a and miR-155 between EAD and AAD was not statistically significant. Finally, ROC curve analyses suggested that these miRNAs could serve as non-invasive biomarkers of early cognitive impairment.
Among five examined miRNAs in the present research, only the expression levels of miR- 101 in study groups were in agreement with the postulate about the inverse relationship between AD and CAC. The mean expression values of miR-101 for the CAC and AD groups were on the opposite sides of the range, while the expression level of the CTRL group was in the middle (AD-1.569, CTRL-1.171 and CAC-0.8340). Furthermore, miR-101 expression was significantly higher in AD compared to the CAC group (p < 0.05). The CTRL group was not significantly different neither from AD or CAC group. However, the results of ROC curve analysis indicated that on average, a CAC patient will have lower miR-101 expression than 64% of controls, and an AD patient will have upregulated miR-101 expression compared to 63% of people in the general population. This analysis provided the quality score which describes the performance of this AD-CAC inverse correlation model based on miR-101 expression, as a good one. This model was also tested with respect to the disease stage of the AD group. Interestingly, miR-101 expression level was significantly higher in EAD compared to CAC (p < 0.05), however, its expression values decreased with the progression of AD towards the later stage, approaching the level of expression in the CAC group. Therefore, no significant difference was observed between AAD and CAC groups, indicating that patients with AAD do not contribute to the significant difference observed between AD and CAC groups.
Conclusions: This study accidentally identified that a certain number of patients with cognitive decline in the Montenegrin population remain undetected. Therefore, neuropsychological screening instruments should be routinely administered to the elderly in Montenegro, even if the patient does not complain of cognitive functioning. The up- regulation of miR-146a and miR-155 could serve as a non-invasive, circulatory biomarkers for the detection of people with CI who are at risk for AD. Together with neuropsychological screening, molecular markers identified by this study, could possibly become routine, easily- accessible tools for screening of the general population for AD.
MiR-101 negatively regulates amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene and APP metabolism, therefore, its down-regulation found in AD is understood as a disease-contributing factor. However, the up-regulating trend of miR-101 in early AD and its decline with disease progression found in the present study, suggests that miR-101 might act within the negative feedback mechanism, related to APP metabolism. Given that miR-101 potentially reflects a progression of amyloid accumulation, it could serve to monitor the effects of amyloid lowering therapy, indicated in the early AD population. Considering miR-101's oncosuppressive role, increased miR-101 expression in long-lasting preclinical and early AD might protect AD patients from cancer. In fact, simultaneous negative regulation of oncogenes and APP gene, through the up-regulation of miR-101, as the overlapping point of different signaling pathways, might explain the opposite incidences of AD and CAC.
Uvod: Pojava patoloških obilježja Alchajmerove bolesti (AB) i njeno kliničko ispoljavanje, su u vremenskoj diskrepanci. Stoga, kliničkim testovima koji se aktuelno koriste, dijagnoza se postavlja decenijama nakon inicijalnih patofiziološkoh događaja. Kako bi se dostigao cilj ranog otkrivanja ove neizlječive bolesti, istraživački napori su usmjereni ka identifikovanju neinvazivnih, široko dostupnih biomarkera, koji bi otvorili mogućnosti za skrining i tako prevazišli nedostatke aktuelnih biomarkera. Sa tim ciljem, ova studija nudi inovativan i širok istraživački kontekst, koji se zasniva na činjenici da obolijevanje od dviju različitih bolesti, AB i karcinoma, karakteriše inverzna incidenca. Naime, ovo nedavno otkriće je donijelo jedan drugačiji, izazovan kontekst u odnosu na prethodna saznanja o zajedničkim biološkim mehanizmima ovih bolesti, koji su takođe, većinom, suprotne prirode: AB se karakteriše ćelijskom smrću apoptozom, a kancer nekontrolisanom ćelijskom proliferacijom. Stoga, smatra se da bi ovi mehanizmi zapravo, mogli predstavljati suprotne strane iste patofiziološke kaskade, objašnjavajući tako i suprotne incidence AB i CAC: ukoliko disregulacija zajedničkih signalnih puteva ovih dviju bolesti vodi povećanom riziku od kancera, rizik od AB će kod iste osobe biti redukovan, odnosno suprotno. Međutim, precizna objašnjenja koja
se nalaze u osnovi inverzne epidemiološke povezanosti ovih dviju bolesti, još nijesu poznata. Male, nekodirajuće RNK molekule - mikroRNK (miRNK), koje ostvaruju negativnu regulaciju ekspresije gena, simultano na višestruke targete, duboko su uključene u patogenezu obiju bolesti i smatra se da posjeduju biološku kompleksnost koja bi mogla ponuditi objašnjenje ovako izazovnog odnosa AB i kancera. S obzirom na dobro dokumentovane uloge miRNK, kao vodećih regulatora procesa ćelijske prolieracije i diferencijacije, migracije i apoptoze, koji su među glavnim karakteristikama AB i kancera, smatra se da bi ove molekule mogle objasniti ključne aspekte patofizioloških procesa obiju bolesti. Uz to, serije istraživanja su pokazale njihov značaj u mnogim aspektima moždanih disfunkcija, a koji su u osnovi različitih teorija AB: urođeni imunitet, neuroinflamacija, deregulacija metabolizma amiloida i oksidativni stres. Stoga je proučavanje uloga miRNK u ovoj bolesti, prepoznato kao obećavajući pravac istraživanja. Štaviše, jedan broj miRNK molekula su vec i prepoznate kao potencijalni biomarkeri ove bolesti. Dominantne teorije AB i karcinoma se baziraju na dva međusobno blisko povezana procesa - urođenom imunitetu i inflamaciji, a neuroinflamatorni signalni putevi i sa inflamacijom povezane miRNK, mogle bi imati krucijalnu ulogu u AB, čineći ih potencijalnim biomarkerima. Stoga su kao patofiziološki fokus ove studije odabrane one miRNK, koje ne samo da imaju dokumentovane uloge u AB i CAC, već svaka od njih ima najmanje jedan ciljni gen koji je uključen u puteve povezane sa imunološkim i/ili inflamatornim odgovorom: miR-29a, miR- 101, miR-125b, miR-146a and miR-155. Uz to, mogućnost da se ove molekule koriste kao neinvazivni biomarkeri, posebno doprinosi translacionoj vrijednosti prezentovanog istraživačkog konteksta.
Cilj: Ekspresija cirkulišućih miRNK, kompleksno uključenih u patogenezu AB i kolorektalnog karcinoma (CAC): miR-29a/b, miR-101, miR-125, miR-146a and miR-155, ispitivana je kod zdravih pojedinaca, onih kod kojih je Montrealskom skalom za procjenu kognicije (eng. Montreal cognitive Assessment - MoCA) detektovan skor u opsegu za blagi kognitivni poremećaj (eng. mild cognitive impairment - MCI), kao i kod pacijenata sa dijagnostikovanim AB i CAC. Postavljena je hipoteza da će ekspresija navedenih miRNK biti u korelaciji sa stepenom kognitivnog deficita ispitanika, što bi moglo biti od značaja u
identifikovanju molekularnog potpisa rane AB. Takođe, očekuje se da bi obrazac ekspresije selektovanih miRNK kod pacijenata sa AB i CAC, mogao objasniti molekularnu osnovu inverzne incidence ovih dviju bolesti.
Metodologija: U ovu studiju su uključena 54 ispitanika, od ukupno 75 regrutovanih pojedinaca. Od 34 volontera koji su se osjećali fizički i mentalno zdravim, njih 18 je bilo uključeno u kontrolnu grupu (CTRL-18). Kod 9 učesnika koji subjektivno nijesu imali kognitivni deficit, kognitivne performanse na MoCA testu su bile u rasponu za MCI (eng. low-performance MoCA (LP-MoCA)-9). Pacijenti kod kojih je dijagnostikovana AB regrutovani su retrospektivno, u Klinici za neurologiju Kliničkog centra Crne Gore (KCCG) (AD-12). Ovim ispitanicima je dijagnoza prethodno postavljena u skladu sa kriterijumima Nacionalnog instituta starenja i Alchajmerove asocijacije. AD grupa je uključivala pacijente u ranom simptomatskom stadijumu bolesti (early Alzheimer’s disease - EAD) - MCI uzrokovan AB i stadijum blage demencije (MoCA skor > 17) i uznapredovaloj AB (advanced Alzheimer’s disease - AAD) - umjerena i teška demencija (MoCA score < 17). Pacijenti sa CAC i bez kognitivnog oštećenja sa patohistološki potvrđenom dijagnozom, bili su regrutovani u Centru za digestivnu hirurgiju KCCG (CAC-15). Standardizovani upitnik, fizikalni i neurološki pregledi, neuropsihološki skrining testovi, gerijatrijska skala depresije, kao i biohemijska laboratorijska procjena, sprovedeni su sa ciljem identifikovanja isključujućih kriterijuma. Odabrane miRNK su bile izolovane iz plazme, kvantifikovane metodom lančane rekacije polimeraze u relnom vremenu i nivoi ekspresije normalizovani upotrebom miR-361-5p gena.
Rezultati: Ovom studijom su u kontrolnu grupu uključeni volonteri bez subjektivnog kognitivnog deficita, ali interesantno, na osnovu skora na MoCA testu, 33,3% njih, naizgled zdravih ispitanika, pripadalo je kategoriji MCI. Neurološki pregled i laboratorijske pretrage nijesu mogli objasniti učinak ovih pojedinaca na neuropsihološkim testovima. Međutim, u LP-MoCA grupi, nivo ekspresije dviju cirkulišućih miRNK, miR-146a i miR-155, bio je značajno viši u odnosu na kontrolnu (p < 0.05). Ekspresija miR-146a je bila u značajnom porastu u LP-MoCA i u odnosu na AD grupu (p < 0.05). U odnosu na EAD grupu, rezultati su pokazali isti obrazac ekspresije za obje miRNK - miR-146a i miR-155, kao i u odnosu na
čitavu, heterogenu AD gupu. Razlika u nivou ekspresije ovih miRNK između EAD i AAD grupa nije bila značajna. Konačno, analiza krivulje operativnih karakteristika (eng. Receiver operative characteristic curve - ROC curve), upućuje da bi miR-146a i -155 mogle služiti kao neinvazivni biomarkeri ranog kognitivnog oštećenja.
Među pet ispitivanih miRNK, samo je nivo ekspresije miR-101 u studijskim grupama bio u saglasnosti sa postulatom o inverznom odnosu između AB i CAC. Srednje vrijednosti ekspresije miR-101 za CAC i AD grupe bile su na suprotnim stranama opsega, dok je nivo ekspresije CTRL grupe bio u sredini (AD - 1.569, CTRL - 1.171 and CAC - 0.8340). Štaviše, ekspresija miR-101 bila je značajno veća u AD, u poređenju sa CAC grupom (p < 0.05). Nivo ekspresije ove miRNK u CTRL grupi se nije razlikovao u odnosu na AD i CAC grupe. Međutim, rezultati analize ROC krive upućuju na to da će u prosjeku CAC pacijent imati nižu vrijednost ekspresije miR-101 nego 64% zdravih pojedinaca, a AD pacijent bi imao povišenu regulaciju miR-101, u poređenju sa 63% opšte populacije. Ovom analizom je obezbijeđen kvalitativni skor, kojim je performansa ovog AD-CAC modela baziranog na ekspresiji miR-101, procijenjena kao dobra. Model je takođe testiran i u odnosu na stadijum bolesti AD grupe. Interesantno, ekspresija miR-101 bila je značajno veća u EAD u poređenju sa CAC (p < 0.05). Vrijednosti su se smanjivale sa progresijom AB, približavajući se nivou ekspresije CAC grupe, stoga nije opservirana značajna razlika između AAD i CAC grupa.
Zaključci: Ovim istraživanjem je otkriveno da u crnogorskoj populaciji nije prepoznat određeni broj pojedinaca sa kognitivnim deficitom. Stoga bi neuropsihološke skrining testove trebalo rutinski primjenjivati kod pojedinaca starije životne dobi u Crnoj Gori, nezavisno od žalbi na kognitivne funkcije. Povećana ekspresija miR-146a and miR-155, mogla bi predstavljati neinvazivni cirkulišući biomarker za detekciju pojedinaca sa kognitivnim deficitom, koji su u riziku za AB. Zajedno sa neuropsihološkim skriningom, ovi molekularni markeri bi mogli postati rutinska, neinvazivna sredstva za rano otkrivanje AB u opštoj populaciji.
MiR-101 negativno reguliše ekspresiju amiloid prekursor protein (APP) gena i APP metabolizam, stoga je njena smanjena regulacija koja karakteriše AB, shvaćena kao faktor koji doprinosi nastanku bolesti. Međutim, trend povećanja nivoa ekspresije miR-101 u EAD,
kao i njeno opadanje sa progresijom bolesti otkriveno u ovoj studiji, sugeriše da bi miR-101 mogla djelovati u okviru mehanizma negativne povratne sprege, koji je u vezi sa APP metabolizmom. Uzimajući u obzir da miR-101 potencijalno reflektuje progresiju akumulacije amiloida, mogla bi služiti i u monitoringu efekata amiloid-redukujuće terapije, indikovane u EAD populaciji. Uzimajući u obzir onkosupresivnu ulogu miR-101, njena potencijalno povećana ekspresija u dugoj pretkliničkoj i ranoj fazi AB, mogla bi zaštititi AB pacijente od kancera. Zapravo, simultana negativna regulacija onkogena i APP gena, kroz povećanu regulaciju miR-101, kao tačke preklapanja različitih signalnih puteva, mogla bi objasniti inverzne incidence AB i CAC.
Pathological and clinical features of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are in temporal discrepancy and currently accepted clinical tests provide the diagnosis decades after the initial pathophysiological events. In order to reach the goal of early detection of this incurable disease, research efforts are directed to the identification of non-invasive, widely accessible biomarkers, which could open the screening possibilities and overcome the main disadvantages of the current AD biomarkers. The present study offers an innovative and broader research context in this regard based on the fact that two different diseases, AD and cancer, have been shown to have inverse incidences. Namely, this recent finding has brought a different and challenging context to the knowledge about shared biological mechanisms involved in these diseases, which are mainly opposite in their nature: AD is characterized by apoptotic cell death and cancer by uncontrolled proliferation. It has been postulated that these mechanisms might actually represent different sides of the same path: if dysregulation of the common AD-CAC signaling pathways leads to a higher risk of cancer, the risk of AD will be reduced in the same individual, or vice versa. However, the precise explanations underlying this negative epidemiological association between these two diseases remain unknown. Small, non-coding RNA molecules - microRNAs (miRNAs), which simultaneously regulate the expression of multiple target genes, are deeply implicated in both diseases and proposed as having the biological complexity to explain such a challenging relationship between AD and cancer. Being well documented as the leading regulators of cell proliferation and differentiation, migration and apoptosis, which are the main pathological features of cancer and AD, miRNAs may be the key points of the pathophysiological process of both diseases. Additionally, a series of studies have demonstrated their implication in a variety of human brain dysfunctions such as innate immunity, neuroinflammation, dysregulated amyloid metabolism and oxidative stress. In fact, these processes represent the backbone of the different AD theories. Studying the miRNA roles in this disease has thus been recognized as a promising research direction and number of the miRNA interactions with the key genes involved in the pathogenesis of AD has already been identified. The most dominant theories of AD and CAC are based on two closely interconnected processes - innate immunity and inflammation, and thus, they have been chosen as the pathophysiological focus of the present study. Neuroinflammatory signaling pathways and inflammation-related microRNAs (miRNAs) could possibly have a crucial role in AD making them promising potential biomarkers. All the miRNAs selected for this study, not only have a documented role in AD and CAC, but rather, each of them has at least one target involved in immune-related and/or inflammatory pathways: miR-29a, miR-101, miR-125b, miR-146a and miR-155. In addition, the possibility to use these molecules as non-invasive biomarkers contributes to the particular translational value of the whole research context presented.
Objective: Expression of circulatory miRNAs which are deeply involved in the pathogenesis of AD and CAC: miR-29a/b, miR-101, miR-125b, miR-146a, and miR-155 were examined in healthy individuals, those whose cognitive performance on neuropsychological screening was in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) range, patients with AD and CAC. It was hypothesized that these miRNA expression levels could correlate with the level of participants’ cognitive decline leading to the identification of molecular signature of early AD. Additionally, it was expected that the expression pattern of selected miRNAs could explain the molecular basis of the inverse incidences between AD and CAC.
Methods: The present study enrolled 54 subjects, out of a total of 75 examined individuals. During the recruitment, of 34 volunteers who felt physically and mentally healthy, 18 individuals were involved in the control group (CTRL-18). Participants who did not report subjective cognitive decline (SCD) but were in the MCI range on Montreal Cognitive Assessment test, formed the low-performance MoCA group (LP-MoCA-9). AD patients were retrospectively recruited at the Neurology Clinic of the Clinical Center of Montenegro (CCM) (AD-12). They were previously diagnosed according to the criteria of the National Institute of Aging and Alzheimer’s Association. AD group included patients in the early symptomatic disease stage (EAD) - MCI due to AD and mild dementia stage, (MoCA score > 17) and advanced AD (AAD) — moderate and severe dementia (MoCA score < 17). Cognitively unimpaired CAC patients with pathohistologicaly confirmed diagnosis were recruited at the Center for Digestive Surgery — CCM (CAC-15). Standardized questionnaires, physical and neurological examinations, open-ended type of SCD evaluation, neuropsychological screening tests, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), as well as biochemical laboratory assessment, were conducted to identify exclusion criteria. Selected miRNAs were extracted from plasma, quantified by qRT-PCR and expression levels normalized by miR-361-5p gene. Statistical data analysis was done with the GraphPad Prism 9 software.
Results: As a control group, this study included volunteers without SCD, but interestingly, neuropsychological screening tests indicated that 33,3% of the apparently healthy subjects were in the MCI range. Neurological and laboratory findings could not explain their neuropsychological performance. However, in the LP-MoCA group, the two circulatory miRNAs, miR-146a and miR-155 were up-regulated compared to the CTRL group (p < 0.05). The expression level of miR-146a was also significantly higher in LP-MoCA compared to the AD group (p < 0.05). The EAD group also followed this interesting expression pattern for both, miR-146a and miR-155, the same as the heterogeneous AD group. The difference in the expression level of miR-146a and miR-155 between EAD and AAD was not statistically significant. Finally, ROC curve analyses suggested that these miRNAs could serve as non-invasive biomarkers of early cognitive impairment.
Among five examined miRNAs in the present research, only the expression levels of miR- 101 in study groups were in agreement with the postulate about the inverse relationship between AD and CAC. The mean expression values of miR-101 for the CAC and AD groups were on the opposite sides of the range, while the expression level of the CTRL group was in the middle (AD-1.569, CTRL-1.171 and CAC-0.8340). Furthermore, miR-101 expression was significantly higher in AD compared to the CAC group (p < 0.05). The CTRL group was not significantly different neither from AD or CAC group. However, the results of ROC curve analysis indicated that on average, a CAC patient will have lower miR-101 expression than 64% of controls, and an AD patient will have upregulated miR-101 expression compared to 63% of people in the general population. This analysis provided the quality score which describes the performance of this AD-CAC inverse correlation model based on miR-101 expression, as a good one. This model was also tested with respect to the disease stage of the AD group. Interestingly, miR-101 expression level was significantly higher in EAD compared to CAC (p < 0.05), however, its expression values decreased with the progression of AD towards the later stage, approaching the level of expression in the CAC group. Therefore, no significant difference was observed between AAD and CAC groups, indicating that patients with AAD do not contribute to the significant difference observed between AD and CAC groups.
Conclusions: This study accidentally identified that a certain number of patients with cognitive decline in the Montenegrin population remain undetected. Therefore, neuropsychological screening instruments should be routinely administered to the elderly in Montenegro, even if the patient does not complain of cognitive functioning. The up- regulation of miR-146a and miR-155 could serve as a non-invasive, circulatory biomarkers for the detection of people with CI who are at risk for AD. Together with neuropsychological screening, molecular markers identified by this study, could possibly become routine, easily- accessible tools for screening of the general population for AD.
MiR-101 negatively regulates amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene and APP metabolism, therefore, its down-regulation found in AD is understood as a disease-contributing factor. However, the up-regulating trend of miR-101 in early AD and its decline with disease progression found in the present study, suggests that miR-101 might act within the negative feedback mechanism, related to APP metabolism. Given that miR-101 potentially reflects a progression of amyloid accumulation, it could serve to monitor the effects of amyloid lowering therapy, indicated in the early AD population. Considering miR-101's oncosuppressive role, increased miR-101 expression in long-lasting preclinical and early AD might protect AD patients from cancer. In fact, simultaneous negative regulation of oncogenes and APP gene, through the up-regulation of miR-101, as the overlapping point of different signaling pathways, might explain the opposite incidences of AD and CAC.